Dr. D.A. Waite - Defending the King James B - 3

Summary

Dr. D.A. Waite defends the King James Bible by emphasizing the overwhelming manuscript evidence supporting the Textus Receptus underlying it, contrasting it with the minority Greek texts used in modern versions. He critiques Westcott and Hort, key figures behind the critical text, highlighting their heretical theological views and the flawed methodology of newer Bible translations. Dr. Waite advocates for formal equivalency translation, as used in the King James Bible, over dynamic equivalency, which he argues alters the original meaning of Scripture.